Kepastian Hukum Penerapan Online Single Submission Risk-Based Approach (OSS RBA) Sebagai Sistem Perizinan Berusaha Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020
Abstract
Online Single Submission Risk Based Approach (OSS RBA) is basically a form of updating business licensing services through the Online Single Submission (OSS) system. However, the existence of the OSS RBA is starting to be doubted in line with the Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 concerning Formal Review of the Job Creation Law against the 1945 Constitution which could have implications for legal uncertainty. This research uses a normative legal research method, namely by using secondary data consisting of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials, then analyzed using qualitative descriptive analysis. The presence of the PP OSS RBA Job Creation Perpu is still valid and has legal certainty. These provisions are contained in Article 184 of the Job Creation Perpu which explains that all implementing regulations in the Job Creation law are still valid as long as they do not conflict with the Job Creation Perpu. We hope that adjustments between the Job Creation Perpu and PP OSS RBA need to be carried out in a careful and careful manner, in this should focus on harmony and consistency within the broader legal framework. So that we can maintain the continuity of applicable legislation, while ensuring the business licensing process remains in accordance with applicable legal principles.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Al Huzni, S. & Susanto, Y. A. 2021. Pelaksanaan Izin Usaha Secara Elektronik Sebagai Upaya Peningkatan Investasi Di Indonesia”, Adliya: Jurnal Hukum Dan Kemanusiaan Vol 15, No. 1.
Asshidiqie, Jimly. 2010. “Model-Model Pengujian Konstitusional Di Berbagai Negara” Jakarta: Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia
Asshidiqie, Jimly. 2010. Hukum Acara Pengujian Undang-Undang . Jakarta : Sinar Grafika.
M. Hadjon, Philipus et.al. 2002. Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia. Yogyakarta :
Gadjah Mada University Press.
Efendi, Jonaedi dan Ibrahim, Johnny. 2016. Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris. Edisi Pertama. Jakarta : Kencana
Erni, Febri Jaya. 2022. Efektifitas Perizinan Berusaha Berbasis Risiko Dalam Rangka Kemudahan Berusaha. Wajah Hukum, Volume 6 (2),, 248- DOI 10.33087/wjh.v6i2.927
Freedy, Imelda Magdalena dan Saputri, Novani Karina. 2018. Reformasi Kebijakan Untuk Meningkatkan Indikator ‘Memulai Usaha’, Jakarta: Center for Indonesian Policy Studies (CIPS).
Johansyah. 2021. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Bersifat Final Dan Mengikat (Binding),” Solusi Vol. 19, No. 2. https://doi.org/10.36546/solusi.v19i2.359.Maulana, R. & Jamhir, J. 2019. “Konsep Hukum Perizinan Dan Pembangunan”, Jurnal Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Perundang-undangan dan Pranata Sosial Vol 3, no. 1
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. 2010, Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta : Kencana
Radjab, Abi M. 2015. Hukum Perizinan. Bandung : Kalam Media.
Riyanto, H. 2020. Pembaruan Hukum Nasinonal Era 4.0. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Vol 9, No. 2.
Simarmata, Jorawati. 2017. Pengujian Undang-Undang Secara Formil Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi: Apakah Keniscayaan?(Perbandingan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 79/PUU-XII/2014 Dan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor27/PUU-VII/2009). Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, Vol 14, No. 1. https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v14i1.74
DOI: https://doi.org/10.61715/jll.v3i1.80
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.